Racism: Genetic or Learned?

end-racismEvolutionary psychology says racism is in our genes — a genetic adaptation that helps groups survive by favoring themselves over others. Skin color cues us in to who’s “in” and who’s “out.” (Yet the most prosperous areas of the world are those that cooperate and trade with each other?)

When I explain the theory, my students are appalled. (Though they readily accept evolutionary psych when it comes to explaining supposed sex differences.)

I once wrote a comment questioning evolutionary psychology on Slate and got the following response:

And what about all of those studies on doctors that found they treat patients differently because of race? What about those studies that show that we show preference to people wearing the same color of shirts as us?

Then shouldn’t children prefer parents who have their same hair/eye color? Not in my case. My mom has brown eyes and very light skin like me and my dad has green eyes and darker skin. Yet as a child I preferred him because mom was the disciplinarian.

And doctors could treat patients differently because they learn prejudice and not because they are genetically programmed to discriminate.

You also have to wonder why so many brown-haired, brown-eyed people have a preference for blonde, blue-eyed looks if our genes cause us to prefer our own type. But then, we’re all bombarded with messages that teach us that blue eyes and blond hair are best, at least on women.

Relatedly, about half of the Black people who take Harvard’s test of unconscious prejudice show a preference for Whites. If evolutionary psychology is right, shouldn’t they have a preference for Blacks? But again, Black Americans (just like the rest of us) are barraged with unfortunate messages that White is prettier, smarter, and less criminal.

Meanwhile, some people show “no preference” for either race when they take Harvard’s “implicit” test of unconscious bias.

Or consider the most recent presidential elections. The younger a person was, the more likely she or he cast a ballot for Barack Obama. Was there a mass genetic mutation that caused younger voters to be less racist? Or has society changed enough through the years that young people have simply learned less racism?

Evolutionary psychology says racism is in our genes. Looks more like it’s learned.

You inherited you grandmother’s eyes. Did you inherit her racism, as well?

February is Black History Month

Related Posts on BroadBlogs
Are Women Naturally Monogamous?
Black Isn’t Beautiful Claims Evolutionary Psychologist
Women Want Casual Sex? Yes and No

 

About BroadBlogs

I have a Ph.D. from UCLA in sociology (emphasis: gender, social psych, women's psych). I currently teach sociology and women's studies at Foothill College in Los Altos Hills, CA. I have also lectured at San Jose State University. And I have blogged for Ms. Magazine, The Good Men Project and Daily Kos.

Posted on February 1, 2013, in feminism, psychology, race/ethnicity and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.

  1. I enjoyed your thoughtful exploration of cultural bias and racism and the theory that these are genetic preferences. So much is attributed to genetics with NO research basis.

    These attitudes about skin and hair color are cultural contagions. I don’t access broadcast media. Just the same, I notice that I have impulses to lighten my hair to blond. Yikes. And I’m pushing sixty and am “otherly curved”. What would I hope to accomplish by this blonding?

    Blonds not only “have more fun”, they also gravitate to the top of the socio-economic heap based on this feature.They marry “better” then have to stay blond to maintain this position. The richer neighborhoods have abundant blondness and the poor are thick with the brown and dark skinned. Perhaps this is simply another unfortunate genetic predilection of brown-skinned folks to not work as hard or be as smart as the blonder variety of humanoids?

    Or perhaps not.

    Thanks for keeping me thinking.

  2. In my humble opinion, the relationships between white/black, blonde Vs. dark, racism/non-racist, and especially Obama’s pattern of bringing in the younger voter are all correlations, most of which, have not been properly tested in a double-blind experiment to determine its validity; but, I think most people would agree these actions, thoughts and behaviors come from two places, especially pertaining to the younger voters, which are the media and academia.

    Other than a professor teaching conservative political science, I have never seen anyone in academia sway to the right. Your blog post two days before the election highlighting some statistic, which clearly was in favor of Obama’s reelection, was nothing short of telling younger students how to vote, especially those who hold you in their highest respects.

    Also, it is thought that 60%-65% of democrats receive their political news from John Stewart, Phil Maher or other such comedians, who represent one side, exclusively.

    To say there might be a genetic trait for any of these correlations is simply wrong. Albert Bandura’s social learning theory captures this in a much more thorough and robust manner with many experiments to uphold his theory on our social mannerisms, as well as how we interact and react to various social circumstances.

  3. I highly doubt that racism is based on genetics because if that were true there wouldn’t be any interracial couples. Racism can only be taught and learned it is not something anyone is born with. For example if it were transferred through genetics then someone who is half black and half white wouldn’t exist since the ancestors of these races were once slaves and slave owners. In the time when there were slaves, whites and blacks openly despised each other, though whites had more freedom to act on their feelings. What I’m trying to say is those who are racist chose to be, though they didn’t have a choice on being taught it, they did decide they wanted to learn and follow it.

    Cassandra

  4. This article really stood out to me. I am an African American male who has gone through my whole life being prejudiced against. In no way do I believe that racism is embedded in our genes. There have been many occasions where I am made to feel like lesser of a person just because my skin is not white. Many of the worst cases that have happened to me were at the hand of older, white adult males. I feel that there is a lot more racism from older generations. I know that they grew up in a different era, but things have changed and many have adapted. Younger generations are becoming less racist and race matters but it is not a deciding factor on who that person is. I have seen a lot more inter-racial couples amongst my friends, and my self. If racism was passed through genetics, then it would not explain the decrease of these prejudices in the younger generation. It is sad when I see those who still show prejudice towards me because I am just as good as a Caucasian, Asian, Indian, and any other race out there. I should not be judged by my color, I just want to be judged on my character. It gives me hope that although many Americans still hold this LEARNED prejudice, an African-American man is our country’s president.

  5. It is interesting how people are against racism and in the same tame they don’t mind sexism. This is why they agree with the evo psyche when it comes to gender differences. Double standard, which black people have too. Also very often people say that it is in our genes men and women to be against each other and not to work together, which evolutionary makes no sense.

  6. I wrote a candid, tongue-in-cheek post on the subject a while ago: http://neerakara.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/racism-is-it-really-that-bad/
    Maybe you will find it worth your time.

  7. If I had inherited my grandmother’s racism, I’d be in trouble. We weren’t really experienced with people of a different color back then. I would have hated Germans and Swedes and loved Pakistanis.

  8. I fully go with learned. We only discriminate based on selected cues. In India and china, within the same race there is discrimination against those with darker skin. In the West, conversely, it is ethnicity that matters, not colour as such. You may be a very tan Caucasian, but you will not be discriminated against as an equally tan half-Black person. We don’t discriminate green eyes against grey, or brown hair against balck, though we could. It’s all in the culture, which colour cues are “meaningful”, and which are not.

  9. In which book and on what page does evolutionary psychology tell us that racism is inborn?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: